PR tree-optimization/19337
Jan Hubicka
jh@suse.cz
Tue Jan 18 06:58:00 GMT 2005
> On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 08:50 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the problem here is link pointer being mapped incorrectly during
> > recursive inlining.
> >
> > Honza
> >
> > void write_char(char);
> > int len(char*);
> > void f(char *a)
> > {
> > int col = 0;
> > int i;
> > void wchar(char c)
> > {
> > if (c == '\t')
> > {
> > do {
> > wchar(' ');
> > } while ((col%8)!=0);
> > }
> > else
> > {
> > write_char (c);
> > col++;
> > }
> > }
> > for(i =0;i<len(a);i++)
> > {
> > wchar(*a);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > 2005-01-13 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
> >
> > PR tree-optimize/19337
> > * tree-inlie.c (initialize_inlined_parameters): Copy
> > saved_static_chain_decl only.
> Why not this instead?
>
> if (fn == current_function_decl)
> p = DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (fn)->saved_static_chain_decl;
>
>
> That seems to work just as well and matches the test used for using
> the saved_args earlier in the same function.
Yes, that would work too. (for tree-profiling I am mid way reorganizing
inliner so it has more saved bodies around so my mind is bit futuristic)
Honza
>
> jeff
>
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list