[PATCH] mudflap: remove usage of builtin_frame_address

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Thu Jan 13 02:50:00 GMT 2005


On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:22:17AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> So what is the back end supposed to do about it?
> __builtin_frame_address (0) gets expanded to hard_frame_pointer_rtx
> by the middle end, without any callback that would allow the back
> end to intervene.

Ah, that's the bug.  Should be the soft frame pointer.

And I'd been thinking of the RETURN_ADDR_RTX hook initially.


r~



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list