[cft][avr/h8] reorg libgcc for double == float

Paul Schlie schlie@comcast.net
Wed Feb 16 08:49:00 GMT 2005


> From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:57:48PM -0500, Paul Schlie wrote:
>> For consistency, might it be possible to also similarly conditionally
>> define the remaining LIBGCC2 supported types and corresponding modes?
> 
> No.  What you want is an entirely different configuration scheme.

Different yes, but not sure it's entirely different or undesirable to
define the existence of libgcc2 types based directly the target's
corresponding definition of the same, as by definition they would be
correct. (it would seem, and hope)

(but do understand that last minute non-critical changes aren't attractive,
 maybe it could be considered for refinement and incorporation after 4.0
 branches?)





More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list