[bitmap memory]: Allocation part 2

[Nathan Sidwell]

Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 10:27 +0000, Nathan Sidwell wrote:

>>This is the final part of the patch series.  It removes BITMAP_XMALLOC
>>and BITMAP_XFREE, which are now only aliases for BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL)
>>and BITMAP_FREE.
>>
>>I've booted and tested earlier incarnations of this patch
>>(on i686-pc-linux-gnu), but last night's run of this part only dies with
>>unrelated libjava problems. I was able to run the c testsuite with no
>>problems.
>>

> I think this got delayed when we went into regression fix mode only.
> Now is probably a reasonable time to resubmit and get this last bit of
> the bitmap memory allocation cleanup finished.

yes, it missed the deadline.  Here's an updated one I just booted and
checked with. ok?

nathan

-- 
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: bitmap-memory-6.log
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20050207/183a8b01/attachment.log>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bitmap-memory-6.patch.gz
Type: application/x-gunzip
Size: 15565 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20050207/183a8b01/attachment.bin>