[testsuite patch]: scan for .global in additon to .globl
Kaveh R. Ghazi
ghazi@caipclassic.rutgers.edu
Sat Dec 24 22:28:00 GMT 2005
Some assembler dialects use .global instead of .globl, right?
Tested via 4.0 "make check" on i686-unknown-linux-gnu.
Okay for 3.4/4.0/4.1/mainline?
Thanks,
--Kaveh
2005-12-24 Kaveh R. Ghazi <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
* g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C: Scan for ".global" also.
diff -rup orig/egcc-4.0-SVN20051223/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C egcc-4.0-SVN20051223/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C
--- orig/egcc-4.0-SVN20051223/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C 2005-11-03 10:42:57.000000000 -0500
+++ egcc-4.0-SVN20051223/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C 2005-12-24 10:37:38.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
// Test if a local definition is in a linkonce/comdat section.
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE\[: \t\n\]" } }
-// { dg-final { scan-assembler-not ".globl\[ \]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE" } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "(.globl|.global)\[ \]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE" } }
// { dg-final { scan-assembler-not ".section\[^\n\r\]*_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE\[^\n\r\]*" } }
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list