[PATCH] make it safe to include basic-block.h and tree-flow.h from C++

[Rafael Ávila de Espíndola]

On Friday 09 December 2005 19:34, you wrote:
> Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola@gmail.com> writes:
> Really funny you should post that.  I had the following patches
> sitting in my local tree wince wednesday.  For consistency with rtl.h,
> I prefixed the name of the fields with "va_".  I don't mind which
> patch is applied, as long as the problem is solved and we have a
> consistent way of doing things.
I don't mind either. If yours is checked in, should I submit a patch for 
tree-flow.h only?

Rafael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20051209/840018c7/attachment.sig>