Fixing the wrapping issue

Sebastian Pop sebastian.pop@cri.ensmp.fr
Mon Aug 15 00:40:00 GMT 2005


This patch should solve PR23386.  I'm bootstrapping and testing this
on amd64 and i686.

Sebastian

	* tree-data-ref.c (estimate_niter_from_size_of_data): When
	step is negative compute the estimation from init downwards to
	zero.

Index: tree-data-ref.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-data-ref.c,v
retrieving revision 2.37
diff -d -u -p -r2.37 tree-data-ref.c
--- tree-data-ref.c	14 Aug 2005 06:28:03 -0000	2.37
+++ tree-data-ref.c	14 Aug 2005 23:50:37 -0000
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ estimate_niter_from_size_of_data (struct
 				  tree access_fn, 
 				  tree stmt)
 {
-  tree estimation;
+  tree estimation = NULL_TREE;
   tree array_size, data_size, element_size;
   tree init, step;
 
@@ -773,11 +773,28 @@ estimate_niter_from_size_of_data (struct
       && TREE_CODE (init) == INTEGER_CST
       && TREE_CODE (step) == INTEGER_CST)
     {
-      estimation = fold_build2 (CEIL_DIV_EXPR, integer_type_node,
-				fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, integer_type_node,
-					     data_size, init), step);
+      tree i_plus_s = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, integer_type_node, init, step);
+      tree sign = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, i_plus_s, init);
 
-      record_estimate (loop, estimation, boolean_true_node, stmt);
+      if (sign == boolean_true_node)
+	estimation = fold_build2 (CEIL_DIV_EXPR, integer_type_node,
+				  fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, integer_type_node,
+					       data_size, init), step);
+
+      /* When the step is negative, as in PR23386: (init = 3, step =
+	 0ffffffff, data_size = 100), we have to compute the
+	 estimation as ceil_div (init, 0 - step) + 1.  */
+      else if (sign == boolean_false_node)
+	estimation = 
+	  fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, integer_type_node,
+		       fold_build2 (CEIL_DIV_EXPR, integer_type_node,
+				    init,
+				    fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, unsigned_type_node,
+						 integer_zero_node, step)),
+		       integer_one_node);
+
+      if (estimation)
+	record_estimate (loop, estimation, boolean_true_node, stmt);
     }
 }
 



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list