[patch] Fix PR23230 - wrong code generated in inner class

[Bryce McKinlay]

Ranjit Mathew wrote:

>>Regression tests for gcj PRs should go in libjava/testsuite, so please
>>include the regression test when you check in your patch. Tests that are
>>actually in the gcc tree are more likely to get run by "random gcc
>>hackers", so its good to have as many tests in there as possible.
>>
>>Of course, if no test for this currently exists in jacks, then it would
>>be great to put it in there as well.
>>    
>>
>
>Tom has already checked in the testcase, on Robin's behalf,
>into Jacks. IMHO, it doesn't make sense to repeat the testcase
>in the libjava testsuite.
>  
>

OK, fair enough.

>It might be better to just import Jacks lock-stock-and-barrel
>into the libjava testsuite (as is done for GNU Classpath now).
>  
>

Yeah, this would certainly get more people running it. However, it does 
mean having another upstream merge to worry about. Perhaps its not a big 
deal for jacks, though - it doesn't change as rapidly as classpath does.

Bryce