RFA/RFC: xstormy16: Improve ASM_OUTPUT_SYMBOL_REF macro

[Richard Henderson]

On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:29:56PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
>   Maybe it is necessary to find out why
>   SYMBOL_REF_FUNCTION_P does not think that the foo symbol is a
>   function ?

Yes.  All symbols should have gone through encode_section_info,
which should have set this bit.

I see the bug.  xstormy16_encode_section_info should call
default_encode_section_info.

I'll also note that the current handling of the below100
attribute ought to be updated such that it uses a symbol_flag
bit instead of mangling the assembly name.

C.f. v850_encode_section_info wrt both of these points.


r~