flush out tree-ssa-dse.c pending changes
Jeffrey A Law
law@redhat.com
Fri Apr 29 00:01:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 13:27 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 11:15 -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> >
>
> > I've also added several tests to the testsuite. Including one for
> > partial dead store elimination, which we do not currently perform.
> >
>
> Your testcase missed one possibility, which is that we hoist i = 3 into
> the &j branch.
That would be caught by the second scan-tree-dump-times
expression. If i = 3 were hoisted into the &j branch,
then there would be a block which looks like
<L.*>
*p = 5;
Which is what the second scan line looks for.
jeff
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list