[PATCH/gfortran] Fix handling of subnormal numbers
Steve Kargl
sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Mon Apr 18 22:18:00 GMT 2005
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:56:46PM +0200, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
>
> One thing that we should remember about nearest in the context of implementing
> proper dealing of subnormals is that while NEAREST(0.,1.) works correctly now,
> NEAREST(NEAREST(0.,1.), 1.) will not be correctly rounded, and the code which
> checks for a shrinking exponent doesn't make much sense for subnormals.
What are your expectation for NEAREST(NEAREST(0.,1.), 1.)?
Before you answer, consider FRACTION(NEAREST(0.,1.)).
--
Steve
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list