Patches for coldfire v4e

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Thu Apr 14 12:05:00 GMT 2005


On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:36:59AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:10:39AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >>
> >>So it seems adding coldfire-linux is the only way
> >>to address this...
> > 
> > Why?  Adding support (if it isn't already there) for something like
> > --with-arch=coldfire should work just as well.
> 
> But how do we change behavior in gcc/config/t-linux
> according to the switch?

You probably don't need to.  The newly built compiler will default to
the right architecture; any assembly routines can be keyed off an
appropriate builtin define.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list