tree profile merge: multiple CFGs at a time

[Mark Mitchell]

Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
>> I think the cfun->cfg->x_foo style is much better that a macro 
>> defining "foo" to be that.  I also think that a get_foo (cfun->cfg) 
>> inline/macro would be acceptable, but I don't see anything wrong with 
>> cfun->cfg->x_foo.
> 
> 
> If you don't have a macro called foo, you can of course lose the x_ prefix.

Indeed; and that is even better.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304