RFC: Faster cp_lexer_peek_token [revised]
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Fri Sep 24 05:02:00 GMT 2004
Zack Weinberg wrote:
>Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> writes:
>
>
>
>>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 00:51:03 -0700, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>I think that's pretty compelling, and I'm actually pretty sanguine about
>>>>the safety of the patch. I've reviewed the patch and I'm happy with it. I
>>>>certainly agree that issuing the diagnostics on the line with the function
>>>>declaration is a win.
>>>>
>>>>I think that it would be good for Jason to comment, before we make a final
>>>>decision
>>>>
>>>>
>>On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:41:19PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I agree.
>>>
>>>
>>You agree that it would be good for you to comment, or you agree that you
>>are happy with the patch? :-)
>>
>>
>
>I hope he meant the latter, because I thought that's what he meant and
>therefore I checked the patch in about three hours ago.
>
>
That's what I thought Jason meant as well. If it's not, he'll let you
know, and we'll back it out...
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list