zero extend pointer converstions to unsigned long long
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Thu Sep 23 23:56:00 GMT 2004
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:35:51PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> * doc/implement-c.texi (Arrays and pointers implementation):
> Document zero-extension of pointers to wider types.
Why do you think extending unsigned is useful? I claim that
the actual useful thing is target-dependent. Thus this bit
> - @c On the other hand, it might be most useful
> - @c for the target if we extend according to POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED.
that you're deleting.
I do not approve your change as-is.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list