bunch of small speed patches

[Geoffrey Keating]

On 10/09/2004, at 2:34 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:

>
>> 	    * gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (print_operand): Use fputs
>>               instead of fprintf for register names.
>>
>> Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.706
>> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.706 rs6000.c
>> --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c	8 Sep 2004 23:19:58 -0000	1.706
>> +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c	10 Sep 2004 04:58:15 -0000
>> @@ -10062,7 +10062,7 @@ print_operand (FILE *file, rtx x, int co
>>        /* Write second word of DImode or DFmode reference.  Works on
>>               register
>> 	       or non-indexed memory only.  */
>>        if (GET_CODE (x) == REG)
>> -      fprintf (file, "%s", reg_names[REGNO (x) + 1]);
>> +      fputs (reg_names[REGNO (x) + 1], file);
>>        else if (GET_CODE (x) == MEM)
>>        {
>>          /* Handle possible auto-increment.  Since it is pre-increment
>>               and
>
> IIRC, gcc has automatically done this transformation since at least
> version 3.0.

That's what I thought, but the profile showed a bunch of fprintf calls 
coming from that location, so...

It may be that the transformation is broken.  Is there a test for it?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2408 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20040910/083f38d2/attachment.p7s>