[rfc] coalesce stack slots
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Tue Sep 7 23:52:00 GMT 2004
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 05:22:53PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> This weekend I got some SPECINT results for your patch for P4. I've
> checked -mtune=i386 and -march=i386/-mtune=pentium4. I am sorry,
> Richard but in overall the score with the patch results in about 0.5%
> slower code. I think freedom in insn scheduling (performed by P4) is
> more important then better data locality for SPECINT.
Any chance you could point me at the particular variables being combined
in SPECINT that is causing the problem? I have trouble believing that
many such variables exist.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list