[lno] cleanups for data-ref.c

Andreas Schwab schwab@suse.de
Thu Sep 2 09:10:00 GMT 2004


Sebastian Pop <sebastian.pop@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:

> Index: tree-loop-linear.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/Attic/tree-loop-linear.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.2.12
> diff -d -u -p -r1.1.2.12 tree-loop-linear.c
> --- tree-loop-linear.c	29 Jul 2004 22:54:22 -0000	1.1.2.12
> +++ tree-loop-linear.c	19 Aug 2004 20:45:18 -0000
> @@ -220,26 +220,8 @@ linear_transform_loops (struct loops *lo
>        compute_data_dependences_for_loop (depth, loop_nest,
>  					 &datarefs, &dependence_relations);
>        if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> -	{
> -	  unsigned int j;
> -	  for (j = 0; j < VARRAY_ACTIVE_SIZE (dependence_relations); j++)
> -	    {
> -	      struct data_dependence_relation *ddr = 
> -		(struct data_dependence_relation *) 
> -		VARRAY_GENERIC_PTR (dependence_relations, j);
> +	dump_dist_dir_vectors (dump_file, dependence_relations, loops->num);

../../gcc/tree-loop-linear.c:223: error: too many arguments to function `dump_dist_dir_vectors'

Checked in as obvious.

2004-09-02  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>

	* tree-loop-linear.c (linear_transform_loops): Fix call to
	dump_dist_dir_vectors.

--- gcc/tree-loop-linear.c	02 Sep 2004 10:24:35 +0200	1.1.2.13
+++ gcc/tree-loop-linear.c	02 Sep 2004 10:29:31 +0200	
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ linear_transform_loops (struct loops *lo
       compute_data_dependences_for_loop (depth, loop_nest,
 					 &datarefs, &dependence_relations);
       if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
-	dump_dist_dir_vectors (dump_file, dependence_relations, loops->num);
+	dump_dist_dir_vectors (dump_file, dependence_relations);
 
       /* Build the transformation matrix.  */
       trans = lambda_trans_matrix_new (depth, depth);

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list