Your 'Class <Protocol>' Work

[David Ayers]

d.ayers@inode.at wrote:

>>On 5 Oct 2004, at 9.34, David Ayers wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ziemowit Laski wrote:
>>>
>>>>Took me longer than expected, but here is the alternative patch I
>>>>promised; no ChangeLog entries for now.  It's running a bit late, so
>>>>I'll defer my commentary until tomorrow. :-(  As always, feedback is
>>>>welcome.
>>>
>>>Hello Zem,
>>>
>>>well I guess we have different views on a gratuitous rewriting of
>>>objc_comptypes :-), but your version seems fine.
>>
>>Good to hear it. :-)
> 
> 
> Actually I have to take that back.  I just tried to have a closer look so
> that I could integrate this part into my version but it seems that your
> handling is incomplete.  It get's gets the:
> 
> id <proto> =/== Class <proto>
> 
> case wrong.  I have to admit that the test case was missing for that
> variant (and maybe some others).  I'll try to come up with a more complete
> comptypes tests. 
> 

OK this test case includes parts of comp-types-* but should be a good to
catch most (all?) of the branches we are interested in.

Cheers,
David

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: class-protocol-1.m
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20041006/248dcea0/attachment.ksh>