Testsuite patch for Solaris 10
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@false.org
Fri Nov 12 22:23:00 GMT 2004
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:04:17PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
> > { dg-require [expr [istarget i?86-*-*] && [expr ![is-option "-m64"]]] }
> >
> > What do you think, besides the daunting task of updating all those
> > tests?
>
> It's not clear to me that embedding pieces of TCL code syntax in
> individual tests - rather than dg-whatever-keyword which have defined
> simple syntax independent of the particular test harness - is an
> improvement. It seems desirable for the test format to be seen as a
> specification independent of implementation language - which might, for
> example, be used with QMTest's DejaGnu emulation, not just with the
> particular current harness.
Amen. Janis, while I think your idea is an excellent one, how about
keeping all of the TCL bits in predicates in some separate .exp file?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list