[PATCH] Fix gcc.dg/pragma-align.c

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 06:33:58PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > Because of the "sixteen" tag?
> >
> > Yes, in fact I used #pragma pack(16) :-)
> 
> Sorry, but could you clarify a little?  According to cvs log, you only changed 
> the dg line so the testcase was (before my patch) the same as the original 
> version commited 4 years ago.  Which was meant to run only on i?86, hence 
> probably the 4-byte alignment.

What I meant to say is: in my last previous version of the patch, which
was not posted but I still have in my archives, I added #pragma
pack(16).  I don't know why I didn't post that bit; I meant to.

> but then how do you interpret:

> which are 5- and 6-byte large respectively on x86?

*shrug* author of the testcase got bored?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz