[libgfortran] Actually use GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Kelley Cook
kcook@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Nov 5 03:53:00 GMT 2004
In libfortran's configure, GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES wasn't being picked up
(due to a recently fixed aclocal oversight). Apparently nobody making a
cross compiler with libgfortran noticed.
After regenerating with automake 1.9.3 and initally getting strange
errors, I had to add some missed quoting in the LIBGFOR_GETTIMEOFDAY
macro. Then I added ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS so autoreconf will know where to
look for no-executables.m4
As a side bonus the 1.8.5->1.9.3 automake upgrade knocks more than 1400
repetitive lines out of the generated Makefile.in.
Both fall under the obvious rule. Regenerated with automake 1.9.3.
Committed after a powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 bootstrap.
Kelley Cook
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: fortran-acinclude.patch
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20041105/b417f6bd/attachment.ksh>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list