[libgfortran] Actually use GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

Kelley Cook kcook@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Nov 5 03:53:00 GMT 2004


In libfortran's configure, GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES wasn't being picked up 
(due to a recently fixed aclocal oversight).  Apparently nobody making a 
cross compiler with libgfortran noticed.

After regenerating with automake 1.9.3 and initally getting strange 
errors, I had to add some missed quoting in the LIBGFOR_GETTIMEOFDAY 
macro.  Then I added ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS so autoreconf will know where to 
look for no-executables.m4

As a side bonus the 1.8.5->1.9.3 automake upgrade knocks more than 1400 
repetitive lines out of the generated Makefile.in.

Both fall under the obvious rule.  Regenerated with automake 1.9.3. 
Committed after a powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0 bootstrap.

Kelley Cook
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: fortran-acinclude.patch
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20041105/b417f6bd/attachment.ksh>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list