V3 PATCH to std_complex.h

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Sun, 30 May 2004, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> So, let me recap:
> 
>    (1) on Glibc-systems, we could try to persuade Glibc people to
>        export those __xxx functions in a way suitable for use by
>        libstdc++.
> 
>    (2) on nonglibc-systems, we just replicate the definitions in
>        libmath/stubs.c? 
> 
> Does that match what you're suggesting?

Yes (non-glibc systems that provide the __xxx functions or otherwise
provide the necessary co-operation with libstdc++ could benefit in the
same way as glibc systems).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm@polyomino.org.uk