[PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES

Zack Weinberg zack@codesourcery.com
Tue May 25 19:56:00 GMT 2004


Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
>> Go away and prove to me glibc isn't broken.  Then we can talk.
>
> I'm not the one who wants to change glibc. 

I'm not the one who's been refusing to post numbers since 1998.

zw



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list