Bad choices by expand_mult_highpart

Richard Sandiford rsandifo@redhat.com
Mon Mar 22 20:15:00 GMT 2004


Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com> writes:
> I'm assuming that CNST1, as passed to expand_mult_highpart, is required
> to be a legitimate INTVAL for mode MODE.  That means it'll be legitimate
> for WIDER_MODE as well.

Duh.  Sorry, I was forgetting that INTVAL is always sign-extended.

Richard



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list