[3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535

Andrew Pinski pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Fri Mar 19 08:14:00 GMT 2004


On Mar 16, 2004, at 07:31, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> writes:
>
> | Hi,
>
> I agree a coordination is desirable, but:


> The bug being fixed is already a regression.  So the question is only
> how far or close you move the regression point.  I don't think
> applying the patch itself introduces a regression.
> We ought to be careful not about use of "regression".

Why are we arguing about a patch which Mark is already said okay for 
3.4.0?
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14535#c7> for the 
approval.



Thanks,
Andrew Pinski



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list