[tree-ssa] Fix 13875
law@redhat.com
law@redhat.com
Tue Mar 2 00:21:00 GMT 2004
In message <20040302000630.GA26165@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson writes:
>On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:50:17AM -0700, law@redhat.com wrote:
>> fold (build (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, base,
>> ! convert (TREE_TYPE (base),
>> ! integer_zero_node))),
>
>This is boolean_false_node.
I know. But if you look at fold-const.c it actually never uses them
directly. I guess I could use constant_boolean_node to get the
appropriate type. I've been working under the assumption that there's
a good reason not to use those nodes directly.
Thoughts?
jeff
>
>
>r~
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list