[rfa] libiberty: splay tree performance improvement

Frank Ch. Eigler fche@redhat.com
Tue Jun 29 03:02:00 GMT 2004


Hi -

rth wrote:

> > The opaque key value is already copied among nodes within the tree,
> > [...] so the key objects cannot be that transient.
> 
> That's for keys stored in the tree.  Keys presented via lookup
> needn't be stable.

You're right.  So does this new requirement sound acceptable,
or else shall I fork splay-tree for libmudflap's pattern of usage?

- FChE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20040629/2fcbc261/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list