[PATCH] for PR16461
Jeffrey A Law
law@redhat.com
Mon Jul 12 19:50:00 GMT 2004
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 07:07, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > as Diego noted, tree-tailcall.c:independent_of_stmt_p must handle
> > > non-SSA name arguments of phi nodes.
> > >
> > > Bootstrapped & regtested on ia64.
> > >
> > > Zdenek
> > >
> > > PR tree-optimization/16461
> > > * tree-tailcall.c (independent_of_stmt_p): Handle non-SSA name
> > > arguments of phi nodes.
> > I'd suggest using
> >
> > if (TREE_CODE (expr) != SSA_NAME)
> > break;
> >
> > Instead since only an SSA_NAME is valid for EXPR in that loop. Why
> > check is_gimple_min_invariant when it's clear that the only valid
> > node is an SSA_NAME?
>
> sure. Ok with the change?
Yes, OK with that change.
jeff
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list