[tree-ssa] fix opt/13798
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Wed Jan 28 18:46:00 GMT 2004
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:03:38PM +0100, S. Bosscher wrote:
> > ! /* Create a new temporary name with PREFIX. Returns an indentifier. */
> >
> > ! static GTY(()) unsigned int tmp_var_id_num;
> > !
> > ! static tree
>
> Why the GTY for this variable? The only reason I can think of, is
> that it needs to be there for PCH, but I thought we were supposed
> to be done compiling headers before anythink is gimplified???
Oh yes. I forgot to mention this.
It's something I noticed when debugging PCH vs non-PCH compiles.
It really does make a difference in the numbers assigned between
the two. I would guess that we're gimplifying too early in a lot
of cases.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list