[tree-ssa] fix opt/13798

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Wed Jan 28 18:46:00 GMT 2004


On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:03:38PM +0100, S. Bosscher wrote:
> > ! /* Create a new temporary name with PREFIX.  Returns an indentifier.  */
> >   
> > ! static GTY(()) unsigned int tmp_var_id_num;
> > ! 
> > ! static tree
> 
> Why the GTY for this variable?  The only reason I can think of, is
> that it needs to be there for PCH, but I thought we were supposed
> to be done compiling headers before anythink is gimplified???

Oh yes.  I forgot to mention this.

It's something I noticed when debugging PCH vs non-PCH compiles.
It really does make a difference in the numbers assigned between
the two.  I would guess that we're gimplifying too early in a lot
of cases.


r~



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list