objc testcase patches
Ziemowit Laski
zlaski@apple.com
Wed Jan 28 00:52:00 GMT 2004
On 27 Jan, 2004, at 16.15, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>> From: Ziemowit Laski <zlaski@apple.com>
>>
>> On 27 Jan, 2004, at 14.32, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>>
>>> My remaining question is that Jim's patch only corrected one of the
>>> three LP64 execute failures. Can you take a look at the other two?
>>
>> I'm sorry, I lost track -- which other two were these? :-) Jim,
>> perhaps
>> you could fix 'em up as well, while you're at it? I'm assuming these
>> also involve casting the return value to size_t, which I pre-approve.
>> Many thanks,
>> --Zem
>
> The 5 original LP64 failures I saw were:
>
> FAIL: objc.dg/call-super-2.m (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: objc.dg/desig-init-1.m (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: objc.dg/encode-2.m execution test
> FAIL: objc.dg/encode-3.m execution test
> FAIL: objc.dg/proto-qual-1.m execution test
>
> My patch (now installed) fixed the first two which are compilation
> failures in call-super-2.m and desig-init-1.m
>
> Jim's patch (yet to be installed) fixes the encode-2.m execute
> failure.
>
> So we still need to address encode-3.m and proto-qual-1.m (also
> execute failures) for LP64 systems.
>
> Actually, on some LP64 systems I now see encode-4.m failing too.
You know, since you have access to an LP64 target and I don't, perhaps
you can be so kind as to fix them? :-)
--Zem
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ziemowit Laski 1 Infinite Loop, MS 301-2K
Mac OS X Compiler Group Cupertino, CA USA 95014-2083
Apple Computer, Inc. +1.408.974.6229 Fax .5477
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list