m68k bootstrapping broken
Bernardo Innocenti
bernie@develer.com
Tue Jan 13 21:57:00 GMT 2004
Gunther Nikl wrote:
>>I checked again, SWAP will also produce a correct cc, here is an
>>updated patch.
>
> I just built a native compiler for m68k-amigaos with a cross-compiler
> that had the updated patch applied. No objects in gcc/ except m68k.o
> differed. Is that a good or bad sign?
You mean "differed between your previous build and the build with
Andreas patch"?
Richard Zidlicky reported a difference in "make compare" which you
can't do unless you perform a full staged bootstrap with a native
compiler.
> Flags used to build the native compiler:
> CFLAGS=-O2
> XCFLAGS=-m68060 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-reorder-blocks
By the way, do you also agree that -fomit-frame-pointer is always
a win on m68k? AFAIK, gdb handles it correctly and all
-fomit-frame-pointer bugs should have been fixed.
I'll run a testsuite with -fomit-frame-pointer enabled to make
sure it doesn't break anything.
My proposal is to switch m68k to imply -fomit-frame-pointer with
-O. Of course, I think we're too late for 3.4, so it will have
to be postponed even if we all agree.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/ http://www.develer.com/
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list