[patch] for PR 14229

[John David Anglin]

> At this point, I think either patch is reasonable.  I will approve both
> of them, and you can decide which way you want to go on this.  I'd lean
> a bit towards the rtl_tidy_fallthru_edge change, because it removes a
> redundant test, and allows the optimization to mostly succeed (except
> for the part about deleting the branch).

I have tested the rtl_tidy_fallthru_edge patch on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.  There are no regressions and it also fixes the
problem noted in the PR.  So, both patches fix the failure.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)