On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 01:08 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > but needs someone familiar with that code to review. That said, if you > feel you match this description sufficiently well, Ben, go ahead! > The wording looks OK to me, with a minor nit for ei_next and ei_prev. The text should say that these two take the _address_ of an edge iterator. Diego.