[Bug middle-end/15855] [3.4/4.0 Regression] g++ crash with -O2 and -O3 on input file
Jeffrey A Law
law@redhat.com
Thu Dec 2 04:57:00 GMT 2004
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 10:32 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:05:43AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > I'm not checking in this change at the current time to give folks
> > (particularly Richard & Jason) a chance to comment.
>
> If you get that much improvement out of it, sure. Might want to
> put a comment before the static variables discussing this issue.
Here's what I actually checked in. Only changes were in comments.
Cheers,
Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
* tree.h (save_eptr, save_filt): Now file scoped statics.
(honor_protect_cleanup_actions): Only create save_eptr and
save_filt if they do not already exist.
(lower_eh_constructs): Wipe all knowledge of save_eptr and
save_filt before returning.
Index: tree-eh.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-eh.c,v
retrieving revision 2.20
diff -c -p -r2.20 tree-eh.c
*** tree-eh.c 23 Sep 2004 14:34:19 -0000 2.20
--- tree-eh.c 2 Dec 2004 04:54:34 -0000
*************** Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
*** 37,42 ****
--- 37,57 ----
#include "langhooks.h"
#include "ggc.h"
+ /* In some circumstances we have to save EH data around a nested
+ exception. The EXC_PTR_EXPR and FILTER_EXPR values are saved
+ into these _DECL nodes.
+
+ We lazily create this pair of _DECL nodes once per function rather
+ than creating a new pair of _DECLs each time we need to save the
+ EXEC_PTR and FILTER. This can save us literally thousands of _DECL
+ nodes when we have many inline destructors with an embedded try block.
+
+ This is safe as we know the lifetime of the values in these _DECL nodes.
+ Their lifetimes also ensure that globbing these uses into a single
+ pair of _DECL nodes requires no additional PHI_NODEs or SSA_NAMEs when
+ compared to having a pair of _DECL nodes per inline destructor with
+ an embedded try block. */
+ static tree save_eptr, save_filt;
/* Nonzero if we are using EH to handle cleanups. */
static int using_eh_for_cleanups_p = 0;
*************** honor_protect_cleanup_actions (struct le
*** 807,816 ****
we never fallthru from this copy of the finally block. */
if (finally_may_fallthru)
{
! tree save_eptr, save_filt;
!
! save_eptr = create_tmp_var (ptr_type_node, "save_eptr");
! save_filt = create_tmp_var (integer_type_node, "save_filt");
i = tsi_start (finally);
x = build (EXC_PTR_EXPR, ptr_type_node);
--- 822,834 ----
we never fallthru from this copy of the finally block. */
if (finally_may_fallthru)
{
! /* If we have not created _DECLs for saving the EXC_PTR
! and FILTER_EXPR, create them now. */
! if (!save_eptr)
! {
! save_eptr = create_tmp_var (ptr_type_node, "save_eptr");
! save_filt = create_tmp_var (integer_type_node, "save_filt");
! }
i = tsi_start (finally);
x = build (EXC_PTR_EXPR, ptr_type_node);
*************** lower_eh_constructs (void)
*** 1644,1649 ****
--- 1662,1672 ----
htab_delete (finally_tree);
collect_eh_region_array ();
+
+ /* Wipe the DECLs we use for saving the EXC_PTR and FILTER_EXPR
+ to ensure we create new ones for the next function. */
+ save_eptr = NULL;
+ save_filt = NULL;
}
struct tree_opt_pass pass_lower_eh =
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list