RFA: MIPS paired single support

James E Wilson wilson@specifixinc.com
Tue Aug 31 23:14:00 GMT 2004

On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 14:49, DJ Delorie wrote:
> We do, and we can contribute it (I have some xstormy16 tests waiting
> for such an event anyway).  It's pretty trivial, though...
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/<cpu>/<foo>.exp

OK.  Sounds reasonable, but it isn't very well specified.  I think it
would make more sense if I could see an example.  Are you using the dg-*
commands?  Do you still have target tests in individual testcase .c
files?  Do you have multiple .exp files in each <cpu> directory?  You
probably don't need one if you have the other.  Is there an established
convention for which one is better?  Are there established conventions
on how to write the <foo>.exp files?

If Red Hat adds the first one, then I could make the mips one work the
same way.

There is also the question of whether Red Hat might already have a
gcc.target/mips directory.  If so, I don't want to conflict with it.
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list