[v3] Return of the son of fp printing.
Mon Aug 30 01:30:00 GMT 2004
Joseph S. Myers writes:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:11:41PM -0400, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> > > Glibc uses a version of GMP under the
> > > covers for its printing and it seemed like too much work and licensing hassle
> > > to bring it over.
> > It's already required to build F95, and there's increased pressure to
> > import it into the GCC tree. So this may not be so far away as you think.
> GMP is LGPL, libstdc++ is GPL+exception, so would this raise any licensing
> issues for libstdc++?
I'll leave the licensing questions for others, but this is why I originally
shied away from pulling in glibc's printf code to do this stuff.
> Would this be including just a few bits of GMP built for the target (in
> addition to building it for the host as required for gfortran unless the
> system has a recent enough version) in libstdc++, as a few bits are
> included in glibc, rather than linking all C++ programs against libgmp as
> well as libstdc++?
We would need basic GMP arithmetic and conversions to and from floating point
types. Since this code would be used for floating point printing, that
probably means many C++ programs linking it in.
More information about the Gcc-patches