[v3] Return of the son of fp printing.
Mon Aug 30 00:59:00 GMT 2004
Paolo Carlini writes:
> Jerry Quinn wrote:
> >How about __builtin_log10? More generally, are all these builtins safe on the
> >3.4 branch?
> Hi and, first, my best compliments for the work!
Thanks! I hope to finally get this off my plate.
> About the builtins, I'm afraid we are going to have problems in the 3.4
> branch: AFAIK
> __builtin_signbit, f.i., doesn't even exist! (it would be very useful
> elsewhere too!)
I wonder if a backport would be possible under the guise of fixing a
regression in fp printing speed from gcc 2.95 :-)
More information about the Gcc-patches