[PATCH] add gcc_assert
Fri Aug 27 16:34:00 GMT 2004
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
>>>! <code>--disable-checking</code> should be left so that even asserts
>>>! are disable, when that is explicitly requested.</li>
>>Grammar: "are disabled".
>>Also, is there a way to make that sentence a little more explicit about
>>what exactly should be done? Perhaps an example of what the
>>release-branch code should look like would help.
>>OK with that clarification.
> Nice. Can we have some pre-approval for patches which change calls to
> abort()/my_friendly_assert() into the new gcc_assert()/gcc_unreadable()?
More information about the Gcc-patches