Tue Aug 24 15:57:00 GMT 2004
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> There is no longer any code on the mainline that generates a
>> NOTE_INSN_LOOP_VTOP. Is there any reason why all references to that
>> shouldn't be removed?
> I don't think there's one, and the same holds for NOTE_INSN_LOOP_CONT.
> The more dead code is found in the old loop optimizer, the better it
> is because we are closer to what we'd get when it is wiped away.
> Bootstrapped/regtested i686-pc-linux-gnu, ok for mainline?
Since nobody has justified keeping any of this, yes, this is fine.
More information about the Gcc-patches