No subject

Geoffrey Keating geoffk@geoffk.org
Tue Aug 17 21:35:00 GMT 2004


Ziemowit Laski <zlaski@apple.com> writes:

> On 16 Aug, 2004, at 13.34, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> 
> > Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> >
> >> You might want to try to make a deal with Zack whereby he will
> >> commit to
> >> reviewing the patches, if you will break them up, so that you know
> >> that
> >> you will at least be assured of getting a review if you do the work of
> >> breaking it up.  I have no idea whether Zack would agree to that
> >> deal or
> >> not, though; that is up to him.
> >
> > Part of why I'm asking for it to be broken up is, I feel competent to
> > review changes to the C front end, but not to expr.c.  I am willing to
> > commit to reviewing changes that touch only the C front end, if
> > properly broken up and explained.
> 
> OK, I'll try and separate that out.  Can anyone commit to review the
> generic changes (gcc.c, expr.c, gengtype.c)
> once I've isolated those? :-)

Yes, I'll do that.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list