[PATCH] Dispose of non-gimplifier users of is_gimple_tmp_var

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Mon Aug 16 14:51:00 GMT 2004


On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:19:21 -0400, neroden@fastmail.fm (Nathanael Nerode) wrote:

> The motivation here is that we're going to have to change the semantics
> of is_gimple_tmp_var and possibly break it into two or more separate
> functions.  Getting rid of totally spurious uses simplifies this process.

These are not spurious uses.  They are valid uses of the current
semantics.  If you want a predicate with different semantics, you should
give it a different name.

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list