[PATCH] Dispose of non-gimplifier users of is_gimple_tmp_var
Mon Aug 16 14:51:00 GMT 2004
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:19:21 -0400, email@example.com (Nathanael Nerode) wrote:
> The motivation here is that we're going to have to change the semantics
> of is_gimple_tmp_var and possibly break it into two or more separate
> functions. Getting rid of totally spurious uses simplifies this process.
These are not spurious uses. They are valid uses of the current
semantics. If you want a predicate with different semantics, you should
give it a different name.
More information about the Gcc-patches