[PATCH] Dispose of non-gimplifier users of is_gimple_tmp_var

[Daniel Berlin]

On Aug 16, 2004, at 9:48 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:

> On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 09:19, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> The motivation here is that we're going to have to change the 
>> semantics
>> of is_gimple_tmp_var and possibly break it into two or more separate
>> functions.  Getting rid of totally spurious uses simplifies this 
>> process.
>>
> I guess I'm missing something.  Though what you describe sounds
> reasonable, what's wrong with is_gimple_tmp_var as it exists today?

It's abusing DECL_ARTIFICIAL.
:)
You must have killed that thread or something.