[PATCH] PR tree-optimization/16808: verify_ssa failed: Missing definition for SSA_NAME
Jie Zhang
zhangjie@magima.com.cn
Thu Aug 5 05:47:00 GMT 2004
Hi Jeff,
>
> This seems like the wrong way to approach this problem and rather
> heavy-weight. We're really trying to get away from calling back
> into the SSA renamer as often as we currently do.
>
I know it is rather heavy-weight. I thought about simply replacing all
the uses of the results of the being deleted v_may_defs with their
operands. But I could not find a clear way to achieve this. So I just
delete the v_may_defs and do rename.
>
> I suggest waiting until Andrew's immediate uses work is done -- it
> may fix this problem as a side effect. At the least it will make
> updating the SSA graph trivial for this kind of thing.
>
Do you mean Andrew MacLeod? Where can I find the information of his
immediate uses work? Is this
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-06/msg00902.html> the best place? Thanks.
cheers
--
Jie
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list