[Patch] grokdeclarator cleanup (newb patch)
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Tue Apr 20 17:34:00 GMT 2004
On 20 Apr 2004 18:05:27 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
> | Note further that the %D in this
> |
> | error ("declarator-id missing; using reserved word `%D'", dname);
> |
> | is incorrect - %D takes a DECL node. It should be %E.
>
> I agree.
OK, whatever. The only case in which it's actually important to use %D is
for the name of a conversion operator, which cannot be a reserved word.
Jason
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list