[Patch] grokdeclarator cleanup (newb patch)

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Tue Apr 20 17:34:00 GMT 2004


On 20 Apr 2004 18:05:27 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:

> |                                  Note further that the %D in this 
> | 
> |        error ("declarator-id missing; using reserved word `%D'", dname);
> | 
> | is incorrect - %D takes a DECL node.  It should be %E.
>
> I agree.

OK, whatever.  The only case in which it's actually important to use %D is
for the name of a conversion operator, which cannot be a reserved word.

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list