gcc -save-temps emits incorrect debug info in 3.4 (breaks distcc bootstraps)
Mark Mitchell
mark@codesourcery.com
Fri Apr 9 20:06:00 GMT 2004
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>Per,
>
>Is there any reason why this bit, that made it to mainline, was
>missing in the 3.4 branch? Without it, the initial .file directive
>refers to the .i file instead of the original .c file.
>
>I'm bootstrapping and regression-testing this patch in 3.4. Mark, if
>it passes without regressions, is this ok for the branch?
>
>
OK.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list