gcc -save-temps emits incorrect debug info in 3.4 (breaks distcc bootstraps)

Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
Fri Apr 9 20:06:00 GMT 2004

Alexandre Oliva wrote:

>Is there any reason why this bit, that made it to mainline, was
>missing in the 3.4 branch?  Without it, the initial .file directive
>refers to the .i file instead of the original .c file.
>I'm bootstrapping and regression-testing this patch in 3.4.  Mark, if
>it passes without regressions, is this ok for the branch?

Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list