[patch] XFAIL anew?.C

[Dale Johannesen]

On Apr 5, 2004, at 3:09 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 23:54:59 +0100, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> 
> wrote:
>
>>> (But, is using abort() and exit(0) really part of our testsuite
>>> standard?  I thought using return 0/return 1 was perfectly 
>>> acceptable.
>>> The change is OK, anyhow; that's just a side issue.)
>>
>> From sourcebuild.texi:
>>
>> "
>> Test cases should use @code{abort ()} to indicate failure and
>> @code{exit (0)} for success; on some targets these may be redefined to
>> indicate failure and success in other ways.
>> "
>
> The C++ testsute has been using return 0/1 for quite a while; changing
> testcases to use abort/exit is not necessary.

In that case, should the doc be changed?