3.4 PATCH: Fix for DW_AT_low_pc and DW_AT_high_pc of inlined functions (DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine).

Carlo Wood carlo@alinoe.com
Thu Sep 25 03:14:00 GMT 2003


On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:35:46PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> This is OK.
> 
> If a test for this bug does not already exist in the GDB testsuite,
> talk to the GDB maintainers about adding one.  (If one already exists,
> you should have seen a failure go away when you ran the GDB
> testsuite the second time.)

Daniel, is there a test in the gdb test-suite that tests
the correct values of low_pc and high_pc for an inlined
function in a function without other instructions?
(Thus: f() { g(); })
If so, what is it called?  I did not see a change with or
without this patch;

> Do you have copyright paperwork with the FSF?  I think we can take
> this patch without it, but larger patches will need it.

I have one for 'GNU libstdc++ for __cxa_demangle and future', a bit
stupid cause they might better have send me papers for the lots.
I'll email them and ask to send me papers to sign that will cover
more.

> zw

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list