PATCH: Merge objc-improvements-branch to mainline
Ziemowit Laski
zlaski@apple.com
Wed Sep 24 20:37:00 GMT 2003
On Wednesday, Sep 24, 2003, at 13:14 US/Pacific, David Ayers wrote:
> Stan Shebs wrote:
>
>> I think we will want to solve it, but that can be done at leisure on
>> the
>> trunk, since it solves a problem that is presently hypothetical.
>> There
>> are other ObjC nonportabilities that are much more urgent to fix,
>> such as
>> the libobjc use of internal GCC headers, which causes build problems
>> regularly.
>>
> I don't find this a convincing argument to introduce more non
> portabilities.
But you're discussing the non-portability of a feature that does not
exist in GNU libobjc in the first place. :-)
> Yes the existing ones should be dealt with, but even more important
> is not to introduce any new ones.
I'd say that user impact, rather than seniority, should drive our
priorities here. As Stan said, the exception non-portabilities are
currently hypothetical, whereas the libobjc build problems can be
decidedly non-hypothetical. Of course, as we Apple folk do not use GNU
libobjc, we do not care about this very much :-(, but it would seem to
me that you should.
--Zem
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ziemowit Laski 1 Infinite Loop, MS 301-2K
Mac OS X Compiler Group Cupertino, CA USA 95014-2083
Apple Computer, Inc. +1.408.974.6229 Fax .5477
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list