[cs] pipe infrastructure support

Neil Booth neil@daikokuya.co.uk
Wed Sep 24 06:34:00 GMT 2003

Mike Stump wrote:-

> I intend to get this change into libiberty.  I must have it for the 
> compile server.  Now, if someone rather that some of the code that is 
> the most non-portable go into libiberty and sit behind nice APIs, well, 
> I don't think that would be bad.  But, at the limit, underneath it all, 
> I have to have the fd for the pipe, no way around this.

So has it been agreed that, for example, a compile server is definitely
a good thing that must go in GCC?

I'm not persuaded, for example.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list